The Smith Commission Agreement

The three main pillars of the agreement are: on 27 November 2014, the Commission published its recommendations, which contained:[3][4] The Commission requested that prior notifications be made by individuals and organisations before the 31 October deadline. [9] About 14,000 emails and letters were received by the public, and another 250 group contributions. [9] On 27 November 2014, Lord Smith of Kelvin published his recommendations which gave the agreement of the five Scottish political parties. On 27 November 2014, the Smith Commission published its agreement on the granting of additional powers to the Scottish Parliament. The Smith Commission agreement was the first time the five major Scottish political parties had come together to agree on Scotland`s constitutional future, and it was a historic achievement. www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/3000/www.gov.scot/Topics/constitution/smith-commission The Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats, who all supported the “no” vote in the referendum, put forward similar proposals to the results of the committees they had set up before the referendum. [10] The SNP and the Scottish Greens, who had backed the `yes` vote, asked what bbc News called `devo max`. [10] The SNP won 56 of Scotland`s 59 seats in the 2015 UK general election on 7 May 2015. In her post-election speech, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon called for stronger reforms than Smith`s proposed, particularly on taxation and welfare. [23] Former Prime Minister Jack McConnell called Smith a “disgrace” and called on Cameron to lead a new constitutional convention.

[24] Malcolm Rifkind, former Scottish Foreign Minister, also supported the idea of a new Commission. [25] In response, Cameron said he would “examine” all proposals for additional powers for Scotland, but initially wanted to implement the Smith Commission`s plans. [26] In addition to the provisions that impose legislation that are included in Scottish law, the Smith Commission agreement has highlighted a number of areas for further consideration between the BRITISH and Scottish governments. Since the Smith Commission, the British and Scottish governments have had discussions on these issues. The attached table contains information on the work being done in these areas. The Commission has also considered delegating the power to vary all elements of universal credit (not just its housing), but this is not in the Commission`s final recommendations. [17] On 19 September, Prime Minister Lord Smith of Kelvin called for a committee of discussions between political parties to advance the debates of the three British political parties (Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats) during the referendum campaign. In October 2014, the House of Commons Political and Political Reform Committee heard evidence criticizing the Smith Commission`s timetable. Professor Michael Keating said he considered the short timetable that made bills until January 2015 unrealistic. He warned of the risk of an agreement being dissolved because there was not enough time to consider technical issues. Both Professor Keating and Professor Nicola McEwen said this was due to political pressure, with union party leaders praising the granting of additional powers and holding British general elections on 7 May 2015.

[18] The agreement also outlined a number of areas where non-legislative measures were needed.